Stanford Can Cover Just Fine, Jesse Palmer

Doug Pensinger

Darius Tahir (@dariustahir) has some news for you, Jesse Palmer.

It may be shooting at a stationary target here, but I happened to catch Jesse Palmer in full pontification mode briefly Sunday night when he declared something along the lines of "Stanford can’t cover anyone" on defense. Now, again, Palmer’s the easiest of easy targets – the only targets easier to joke about are douchebags, bros, hipsters and douchebag hipster bros – but what he said is a common-enough feeling that it’s basically fair to go after.

The truth is that not only can Stanford cover people, but it is, in fact, pretty good about covering people! You won’t necessarily confuse the defensive backfield this year with the 2011 LSU Tigers, but the group is performing well, especially since they are starting a true freshman (in his first year starting) at corner, a true sophomore (in his first year starting) at strong safety, a redshirt sophomore (who missed all of last year to an ACL injury, and is also in his first year starting) at free safety, and, as the relative old man of the group, a redshirt junior…who’s also basically in his first year starting. (And don’t forget nickel corner Usua Amanam, who’s a redshirt junior….in his first year starting, and also is only in his second year as a defensive back.)

Statistically, they are quite good. The oft-repeated claim is that they give up a ton of yards through the air, but that’s a very faulty statistic – they aren’t getting yards running, so they are passing instead. Opponents pass against Stanford 42.6 times per game, which is the most in the country. Shockingly, they’re getting a lot of yards doing it!

So look instead at yards per attempt, in which Stanford ranks 25th in the country, at 6.2 yards per attempt. (that’s before you deal with the NCAA’s idiotic policy to count sacks in the rushing statistics. As Stanford is #1 in the country in sacks, it’s pretty clear opponents aren’t doing terribly well when they decide to pass.)

Stanford’s 11 picks ranks 28th in the country, and its 54 passes broken up is 2nd in the country.

In other words, opposing quarterbacks find it hard to complete passes against Stanford. When they do manage to complete passes, QBs only average 10 yards per completion, which means opponents generally stay stopped. (That’s fifth in the nation, by the way.)

Nor is Stanford feasting against an easy schedule. They’ve played against some top-flight QBs – Barkley, Scott, Price among others – and some really good wideouts/receivers – Marqise Lee, Robert Woods, Tyler Eifert, Austin Seferian-Jenkins, Keenan Allen, Marquess Wilson…

So, basically, yes, you can sleep well at night: you’ve always thought Jesse Palmer’s a dolt and that’s still true. (Unfortunately, proving Jesse Palmer wrong means nothing to Chip Kelly, who only wants to hear you scream. And odds are, like any great horror movie villain, he will make you scream on Saturday night.)

(All stats from cfbstats.com except where linked.)

Comments

Interesting

It certainly seemed like this unit took a step up from last year, it’s interesting to see the case made this way. After the AZ game it certainly seemed like a weakness, but I suppose if opponents are passing on every down you’re bound to give up some yards.

Bend But Don't Break Pass Defense

We rarely get beat deep. Most passing TDs have been underneath routes where the receiver made it into the end zone eventually. But we seem to be victimized sometimes when we lay off a bit too much and give up a series of short passes (some of which are broken for more yards). Good QBs can take advantage of that. Fortunately, the strong pass rush has helped to offset this “weakness”, leading to drives ending before they get too far.

Gotta love the hits our secondary has been delivering too!!

ehh, actually AZ threw the ball over our heads a little

They are better tacklers, however, than before, unless they try and knock people out and try to tackle with their heads down versus wrapping up. Terrence Brown and Jordan Richards are susceptible to going for the big hit and giving up a lot more yards. Boy, I’d love to see Alex Carter put a wallop on DAT

Our secondary has been very good

They have been exceptional in the end zone with breaking up passes. Given how young they are, I think there is a lot of room for them to grow and I expect our secondary will be even better next year. They’re also quite fast this year and hit hard as hell – those have me excited about the game against Oregon. I’m not convinced their runners will survive the hits from some of our guys :)
I also think are stats on the secondary are unfavorable because we have faced some very pass happy teams with excellent QB’s. In the Arizona game Scott kept having to thread the ball through such tight spots (and he did it, kid’s a monster).

Secondary is Stanford's "Weakness" @1:23 in this video

The Legend persists.

http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=espn:8704243&startTime=00:00

Apparently Reynolds hasn’t made any lists, nor has Richards, nor has our four better-than-ever CBs. So, what has been the QB ranking against Stanford, compared to all other teams? Stanford: 129.77 (8 games Nunes, 4 games Hogan), Opponents: 114.82 (Barkley, Matt Scott, Mariota, and Hundley, among others). (all data from www.cfbstats.com)

View All Comments
Back to top ↑