The Biggest Question Mark For Stanford Heading Into 2016

Mark J. Rebilas-USA TODAY Sports

Christian McCaffrey is a once-in-a-generation type of talent, humble yet confident enough to handle any sort of situation, and both delicate enough and explosive enough to make defenders fall over, untouched. He has a unique way of making players look like they've never played football before and voters look like they've never watched it before.

However, lost in the preseason hype build up for McCaffrey's 2016 Heisman campaign is that someone needs to block for him -- something that has become a huge question mark for the Cardinal coming into 2016.

The last time there was this much uncertainty on the offensive line was heading into the 2014 season, when Stanford had to replace three starters on the offensive front. Even though David Shaw called the unit the "most talented offensive line" he had ever had at Stanford, it was the stumbling block of the team. Despite having arguably the best defense in program history, Stanford crashed and burned while finishing 8-5.

The running game suffered, and going down with it was Stanford's offense. Sure, they settled in and worked out the kinks at the end of the season, rolling through the latter half of their schedule, but it came far too late. Instead of heading to Pasadena, they found themselves close to home at the Foster Farms Bowl.

Now, heading into 2016, Stanford will return just two starters on the line, Casey Tucker and Johnny Caspers. The expected departures of Kyle Murphy and Joshua Garnett and the unexpected departure of Graham Shuler has left a void to be filled on the offensive line and in leadership, something Stanford will need to replace if they want to repeat their 2015 success.

In the Spring Game, the first team line put Tucker at left tackle, Brandon Fanaika at left guard, Jesse Burkett at center, Caspers at right guard, and David Bright at right tackle. It did move around a little bit, but some mix of that crew should figure to start against Kansas State on September 2nd, barring injury or other unexpected developments. But can we really have unwavering faith in this group?

Let's start with what we know: Tucker should be very good, but certainly showed that he still has some room to grow in transitioning to left tackle. In the Spring Game, the first action we've seen him in since he played right tackle in the Rose Bowl, Solomon Thomas blew him up.

Sure, Thomas is a transcendent talent, and some of that goes on Fanaika, the guard and former four-star recruit, but there still needs to be better chemistry from these two.

A former five-star recruit, Tucker is a very talented lineman, but there's still some obvious questions about cohesion there -- both probably have gone up against Thomas time and time again in practice. For Stanford fans, hopefully it says more about how dominant Thomas is than exposing some sort of issues on the left side. Shaw also indicated that he might need to shuffle the line to get the "right combination of guys," so perhaps we could see some changes on this side.

The less-heralded Bright also brings a lot of flexibility and skill to the table for a line that might need some shuffling.


"One guy whose name really doesn't get mentioned very much is the guy who helps me sleep at night right now -- David Bright," Shaw said after the Spring Game. "I know he can play left tackle, I know he can play right tackle, and I know he can play guard. He's really smart, knows all the positions, and he's physical."

Perhaps moving him around will make this offensive line stronger as a group, and could leave more time for either Keller Chryst or Ryan Burns to make decisions.

Caspers played in all 14 games last season, and should be a leader from the right side along with Bright, if the line stays that way. On the other hand, Burkett, the presumptive center, is a former four-star recruit, but has played just five career games, and hasn't had much experience.

It's undeniable that this is a talented bunch. However, talent alone will not remake this offensive line into what it was last year -- 2014's offensive line had three five stars, a four star, and a three star, yet it took them ten games to start working together effectively. Just like this year's line, all had some game experience, with a couple of stalwarts, but most had played only one year or sparingly.

How this line fits together will determine whether Stanford will sink or swim this season. The Cardinal has the offensive weapons to succeed -- it just needs give them opportunities to make plays, not something I can confidently say it will. If it doesn't, it could squander what could be Stanford's last year with arguably the most dynamic college football player in history.

From what we've learned over the years, never question Stanford's ability to quickly recuperate from losses, unless it's on the offensive line. Stars like Shayne Skov, Andrew Luck, and even Jim Harbaugh have left with few hiccups, except for maybe Josh Nunes, but offensive line departures really have hamstrung the Cardinal. Even in last year's Rose Bowl season, it took until the second half of the UCF game to get the line going.

I guess it all really does start with the offensive line, after all.

Comments

OLine and LBs

I somehow feel the OL will transition better than 2014 because the staff has seen the struggles before so they will approach it better this time.

It’s the LBs thats less talked about but one of the key positions in the Stanford ascendancy. Any talk of Stanford D will mention skov murphy chase thomas Blake Martinez because they are tackling machines and game changers. I hope 1 or 2 of the rotation step up because I just don’t see that dominant force which can defend the run, pass rush and cover some speedy RBs and slots. If DL is again shaky that’s going to a loong season against pac-12 offenses

OLine and LBs

The O line melding together is a concern but I don’t see LBs as a problem area. They have been replaced and excelled year after year and the talent pool there is far greater than the Oline and with more game experience. They will do fine, but the reference to Nunes speaks to my concern, remembering Josh throwing grounders when he had the QB job. (I remember Rick Neuheisel saying he recruited Nunes and couldn’t understand his problems) Chryst and Burns have big reps and no experience and even with great running game and good receivers, the Cards will go only as far as the QB can take them and neither is yet proven.

The "O" Line - 2016

If people will go back and look seasons 2012/2013 and 2014 they will see losses against the big schools that should never have happened. Shaw had the mind set to be as conservative as a bank loan officer. He kept a boring and very predictable script all season long and the defenses knew it. Prime example: Late 4th quarter and Gaffney lines up to run the short yardage play against Michigan State. He was stopped stone cold. Even lost a yard or two. Every one in the stadium knew what play would be run. Shaw could have run so many options. 1) Fake Gaffney up the middle. 2) QB sprints out with option to pass or run. 3) Call a quick count and draw MSU off sides. Those guys were sitting there with their ears back ready to explode. 4) Hide the Tight End. Let him delay, step across the line for a pass.

View All Comments
Back to top ↑