The Stanford Cardinal came into the 2016 season with high expectations all around, and passed their first true test with a convincing victory over Big 12 power Kansas St., 26-13.
Stanford showed flashes of brilliance on both sides of the ball with several players stepping into the limelight in week 1.
Junior pre-season All-American Christian McCaffrey did not disappoint with another stellar effort with 126 yards rushing, and 210 total all-purpose yards; while providing one of the most electrifying displays that will never go in the history books due to a block in the back on a 97-yard punt return.
First time starter, QB Ryan Burns, played well in the first half to keep the Cardinal offense moving in the right direction, and ended the game 14-18 and 156 yards in the air.
The stars of the night were on the defensive side of the ball as the nation witnessed the Cardinal with one of their best defensive efforts against a team that is used to putting up large numbers on the offensive side of the ball. The Cardinal registered 8 sacks, 2 interceptions, and a safety with their tremendous effort.
In the post-game press room, Coach David Shaw was very clear with his statements:
Afterward, Coach Shaw was adamant that “the win was great, but there is still a ton of work to do, and not just one area that needs to be fixed”.
Report Card Breakdown
Total Offense: B
The offense for the Cardinal looked very efficient in the first half; but the 2nd half was a different story. The Cardinal will need to make adjustments, and be prepared to open up the offense a bit as the USC Trojans have a fast defense and will be looking to make amends for their devastating opening weekend loss to Alabama.
Quarterback: B-
QB Ryan Burns stepped into the unenviable position of taking over for a 4-year starter that led the program to new heights. Burns moved the offense with precision and great ability in the first half, and put K-State on their heels. Then, K-State made adjustments at halftime, and Burns did not. Burns looked confused, and could not seem to move the ball well at all in the 2nd half, which included an egregious turnover with a botched hand off that almost cost the Cardinal big time in the 3rd quarter. Burns did post decent numbers and did not have an incompletion until the 3rd quarter, but there were several times that he needed to read the defense better, and make the check down. Is that all to blame on Burns? Of course not, Coach Shaw is not going to turn over full autonomy to his new QB in game one, but the young QB also has to be able to read when there are eight men in the box, and check out to a swing pass or spread out the offense; Coach Shaw would certainly allow for that. Coach Shaw inserted Keller Chryst for a drive, and the young QB led the Cardinal to a score while making another highlight reel block downfield to lead Christian McCaffrey for a 35-yard score. As of now, there is no controversy at QB; Burns is the penciled in starter at the moment, and Coach Shaw will surely keep a keen eye on the situation.
RBs: A-
Heisman contender Christian McCaffrey was stellar again on Friday night with 120 yards on the ground and 2 scores that led the Cardinal to victory. The stat most folks did not notice is the 7 receptions made by McCaffrey that were crucial to keeping the offense moving. There is no doubt that every team is going to key in on McCaffrey every play, and it will be up to the rest of the Cardinal to step up for the team to be successful in 2016. The Cardinal sorely missed sophomore Bryce Love in the game, as the rest of the RBs were non-existent with a negative yardage game.
WRs: A-
5th year Senior Michael Rector was phenomenal in the game, and provided an early season highlight reel grab with his 40-yard TD early in the 1st half. Rector is just getting started, and you can see that he will be heavily relied upon this season. Trenton Irwin shows flashes of his skill on several plays, but he was rarely looked upon in the game. The Cardinal will need to open it up a bit, so that the pressure and eyes can be taken off Christian McCaffrey to make plays.
TEs: B+
TEs Greg Taboada and Dalton Schultz both played solid and made a few big grabs in the game. Taboada has really worked on his route-running skills, and it showed in the game with his big 25-yard reception that kept a drive alive early in the game. The big issues that arose was the blocking ability for these TEs as K-State was able to get off the line early, and rack up Christian McCaffrey for short gains or losses on several rush attempts. Stanford is TE University for a reason, so look for these two young TEs to make adjustments, and be ready for USC.
Offensive Line: B
Stanford answered one of their big unknowns coming into the season with a solid performance from their offensive line. The O-line kept Burns upright while in pass protection, and gave him plenty of time to make reads and throws in the pocket. The right side of the line played fairly well, but the left side needs to work a bit with their run-blocking ability. Returning lineman Casey Tucker is now the anchor on the left side of the line at Tackle and performed well in pass blocking; but there were several occasions that he made the wrong block on a run to his side that cost the offense yards. It’s a new position for Tucker, and with experience on the left, he will be better off in the long run. The best part was zero holding penalties committed by the line.
Total Defense: A-
The defense for the Cardinal was superb all the way around, and will just need to make a few adjustments here and there to be successful throughout the season.
Defensive Line: A
Junior Solomon Thomas is a beast, pure and simple. Many are already comparing the young man to former USC standout and current NFL stalwart Leonard Williams. It just seems that the young Defensive End has a non-stop motor and is always in the face of the quarterback, or making the tackle. The Cardinal are stacked this year on the defensive line with the return of Harrison Phillips, and will need the DL to continue the mantra of “party in the backfield” for the Cardinal to be successful.
Linebackers: B
The LB corps had a solid start to the season with Peter Kalambayi leading the way on the outside by providing constant pressure up the field, and was a terror to the K-State QBs all game-long by registering 2.5 sacks and 3 tackles for loss. The ILBs were gaining traction throughout the game, and played better once they were more comfortable with the offensive spread of the Wildcats. Kevin Palma did step up, but also missed a few opportunities that sprung K-State for solid gains up the middle. Joey Alfieri played well, but needs to set the edge better, and make sure to always keep to the outside.
Secondary: A
The Cardinal Secondary had a fantastic game on Friday night. Zach Hoffpauir came back to the Farm exactly where he left off by living up to his nickname “The Tackling Machine” with 9 tackles. Quenton Meeks is quickly making a name for himself on the outside as a cover corner and living up to his moniker as it seems every time the Cardinal play under the bright lights, it’s “Showtime” for the young corner. The “Governor” Dallas Lloyd has steadily improved every year and made a big INT early in the game that proved to be a big turning point. The secondary played well, and made only a few mistakes that surely will be cleaned up prior to next week. Safety Ben Edwards was a little too eager in his first playing time, and missed a few plays that proved costly and kept drives alive for the Wildcats.
Special Teams: B
The Special Teams for the Cardinal opened the season to a mixed performance as Kicker Conrad Ukropina booted a 50-yard FG with plenty of room to spare, and Punter Jake Bailey has dramatically improved his hang-time ability with his booming punts. The kickers for the Cardinal will be a bright spot this season, and look for Coach Shaw to place more faith in this group throughout the season. The issues were on the penalties from the kickoffs, and on the 97-yard electric punt return by McCaffrey that was called back. Coach Shaw pointed out that: 1. McCaffrey should never try to return a punt within his own 5-yard line, and 2. The call on the block to the back seemed justified to him. Also, three penalties were called in a row on the kickoff team that made Coach Shaw state out loud that this will NOT happen again. There is a distinct feeling that there will be some conditioning drills added to this group in the coming weeks before USC.
Coaching: B
Head Coach David Shaw did not open up the playbook this week; he kept it simple and did not want to inundate his new QB. He did not want to go away from the inside run, and did not want to show his hand this early in the season. This style tends to infuriate fans, as they want to see big offense and a swarming defense. After the game, Coach Shaw said, “There is not just one thing he wants to fix, it’s about 10 things that need to be fixed.” Coach Shaw will not change his way, and why should he? He is one of the most successful coaches in Cardinal history. Fans just need to accept he is not going to all of a sudden change; Coach Shaw has proven his system works.
Overall: B+
This match up was a slug fest from the beginning. K-State played very well, and made adjustments late to put some fear into the Cardinal. Stanford took the shots to the chin, survived, and will be stronger for the season. There is a lot to clean up on both sides of the ball, but fans should be excited about the prospects for the Cardinal in the 2016 season.
Stanford comes into the week on a bye, and will be facing the USC Trojans on the Farm under the bright lights on Saturday Sept. 17th at 5 PM on ABC.
Comments
In my view two of the best performances in the KS game were by players who Shaw chose to play the fewest minutes.
First there was Keller Chryst, who managed the most efficient drive of the evening, going 65 yards in 5 plays. He opened things up with an 11 yard pass to keep the defense honest, and then repeatedly handed the ball to McCaffrey for runs of 3, 9, 7 and 35 yards. Chryst didn’t face a single third-down play on his drive. It is true that McCaffrey earned all of those yards and that Chryst only took one pass, but given the importance of QB game management in Shaw’s system, Chryst’s near-perfect drive has to mean something. I haven’t seen anyone that efficient at moving the ball for us since Luck. It was too small of a sample size to draw any long-term conclusions, of course, but it was encouraging.
My second key performer of the game was true freshman lineman Nate Herbig. Shaw’s decision to burn Herbig’s red shirt may have saved the game as he made a key contribution to springing McCaffrey free for the game-clinching touchdown (as seen here: https://twitter.com/IoaneW/status/771926837068988416). I hope we get to see a lot more of him this season.
By OC Tax Man on 09.07.16 8:08am
Reposting the link: https://twitter.com/IoaneW/status/771926837068988416
By OC Tax Man on 09.07.16 8:10am
I just realized I mixed up #96 and #98 on the play. But Herbig certainly looked like an immovable object on the play nonetheless.
By OC Tax Man on 09.07.16 8:28am
Actually an interesting take
I remember someone posting on the gamethread that the running game looked good when chryst took over as the QB suggesting that the protections he was calling reading the defense seemed better than burns. Burns for his part passed the ball really well and went through his progressions before checking down to mccaffrey. The case could be made by coach shaw to use both their talents as they see fit against the opponent at hand
By layman on 09.07.16 10:45am
Wow................That is a positive take on the game!
I saw a game that Stanford opened up reasonably well with and then put itself in a position to lose. NEVER LET AN INFERIOR OPPONENT GET BACK INTO ONE POSSESSION FROM WINNING….and this was after K-State had their fumble recovery/touchdown called back. Otherwise…..we WOULD HAVE BEEN BEHIND. Sure, Shaw might have played differently then yadayadayada but I did not come away impressed with the overall play of the team in that game, though there were some bright spots. Sure McCaffrey got 126 yards, but he was 20 for 50 yards other than his two breakaways – the second of which came at the end when K-State was playing the ball for a turnover more than McCaffrey. So I think the OL has some work to do here on the inside runs. The DL and LBs were strong, but our secondary got exposed a bit. Hoffpauer, though a tackling machine, is not a strong coverage back and Holder lived up to his name far too often. The K-State QB was weak and essentially playing in his first college game. We could be exposed against a more seasoned and capable QB, though I think the secondary talent is there – and our strong QB pressure certainly helps them. Both Burns and Chryst looked comfortable out there. The kicking game was awesome…………
OK. It was the first game of a long season, and K-State is not UC Davis. But I saw a game where we ultimately struggled a bit to put away a team that is probably a .500 team in the Big 12 led by a completely inexperienced QB. My issues are mostly with the offense and coaching, which are probably related. Surrendering 13 points to K-State is a solid performance (recognizing that a fumble return and a couple of PI non-calls could have meant 7 – 10 more points). I give the defense a B+. Offensively, we went three and out too many times in the second half – giving K-State a chance to get back in the game. Thankfully our punting made it incredibly difficult for them. Despite a very solid performance by Burns and a couple of McCaffrey runs, I give the offense/coaching a C+. Kicking gets an A+. All of that was enough to get by K-State………….but we will need a lot more against our upcoming opponents. And I don’t doubt that we will get it.
By hoyaparanoia on 09.07.16 9:13am
I wouldn't give the secondary an A
Looked a bit slow, and the two questionable non-calls on pass interference raises concerns.
By vk on 09.07.16 9:25am
Yeah, I kept cringing at the early contact from Holder
But I suppose that’s PI for you: inconsistently called, and one of the biggest calls in the game.
By Tim Eckert-Fong on 09.07.16 10:29am
the one in the end zone
looked like holder was facemasked and he fell down on top of the receiver as a result.
By hutre67 on 09.07.16 1:05pm
Exactly my concerns
When KState spread the field they identified and singled out hoffpauir on a couple of slants and deep balls. While holder resorted to PI the second he got beat is troublesome as we goes up against alpha dog receivers like juju, gabe marks, darren carrington
By layman on 09.07.16 10:41am
Despite hiccups, quality win for week 1, congrats!
By RosterUp on 09.07.16 10:40am
Offensive line wasn't stellar but didn't shoot themselves
I am glad that you brought the no penalties aspect which is definitely underrated for a line making its first start. But the entire second half was the tale of the line not moving quick enough to make blocks, once blocks were made they couldnt sustain them, getting beaten off the snap,etc. Even the first half replays showed how the line did get beat off the edge a couple of times but burns smoothly navigated his pocket to buy more time to survey the field. Bottom line: Our offense lives and dies by the line.
I thought the LBs were excellent and the secondary was merely good. The OLBs just boatraced the KState OL confusing them with who is coming off the line, stunting, twisting to create gaps. Alfieri has to look at the tape of chase thomas the best versatile OLB we have had and watch the moves he puts on some of the OL and TE (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XWRV3AIvRBs) . The secondary as a whole played decent and had some good plays by meeks and reid. But KState wasn’t a great threat I should add.
By layman on 09.07.16 10:55am
Meh, Stanford won
It was the result everyone expected. Everyone just forgot that Shaw plays maddening conservative football the first few weeks of the season.
What’s different about this year is that USC, the traditional "open it up" game, is the second game of the season, and comes off an early season bye. Unless Shaw feels that the Trojans are woefully inept this season (not an impossibility), then next weekend should give us more of an idea as to the status of the team and what to realistically expect going forward.
As it is, the gauntlet of our early season schedule suddenly got slightly better with four of the next five teams falling flat on their faces in week 1. Even Washington’s win may be deceiving — watching their game on Football in 60 on the Pac-12 Network last night made me realize that it isn’t that UW is a top 10 team, but rather that Rutgers was woefully terrible in all facets. Their pass coverage was atrocious, and they may as well have called the football a hot potato given the number of times they gifted it to the Huskies. About the only thing that worked in their favor was the run game, and even that was stymied by poor penalties. We may not even know a lot about Washington until they play Arizona the week before they play Stanford, considering the stinker that is their non-conference schedule comparatively (Rutgers, Idaho, and Portland State).
By RedOscar on 09.07.16 5:57pm
beats what happened at Northwestern last year
who ever started at QB vs KSU, gets my vote to start vs. USC.
I don’t think Stanford ever stretched the field again with a deep pass after getting that touch down in the first half.
The game vs. USC is a can’t win for Stanford. USC was so humilated by Alabama on a national stage it puts Stanford into
a win or be humilated by losing to USC predicament.
Stanford will have to play better vs. USC. I’m confident their staff will know what to work on in preparation for USC.
By kollesteral on 09.08.16 9:46am