Stanford’s Offensive Line Must Improve

Photo by Ezra Shaw/Getty Images

Stanford’s offensive line has long been the trademark of the team. It is big, it is smart, and it is physical. They have had great players such as Andrus Peat and Joshua Garnett in their O-line, and they will continue to have great players come through. This year, however, Stanford has a very young line. And if the Cardinal are to accomplish what they set out to this year, which is to win the Pac-12 and make the playoff for the first time, then the O-line simply has to get better.

“We were one block away” stated coach David Shaw in his postgame comments after Stanford’s home win against Kansas State. Shaw was referring to the somewhat measly rushing stats that Stanford put up against the Wildcats, and he was trying to say that it seemed like on every run play, they were just always one crucial block away from taking it to the house. And I agree with Coach Shaw. With a running back like Christian McCafferey in your backfield, you always have the opportunity to break a simple run play for 6 points if all goes well. And for most of the night, it really looked like Stanford was constantly this close to taking it to the house. Of course, Christian did break one run out for a 40-yard score, but we were missing those long runs that we have become accustomed to seeing from #WildCaff.

However, in a sport like football, one block can really make or break a play. And while I know that Shaw was trying to support his linemen after a somewhat lackluster performance, being “one block away” can mean the difference between a really good and a really bad offense.

The Cardinal love to control time of possession when they have the ball. Stanford, of course, does this by constantly running the ball down the defense’s throat, taking lots of time off the clock, and methodically moving the ball down the field one play at a time. This strategy really only works if you are able to be successful with your runs, especially on first downs. Last Friday against the Wildcats, Kansas State would put 8 or 9 men in the box every time Stanford had a first down, because they knew that the Cardinal were going to run the ball. And run the ball they did. This is nothing new for Stanford football, who can sometimes be a little predictable. The only difference, however, between years past and now, is that even when Stanford was running the ball into the face of 8 men in the tackle box, they could still get 4 or 5 yards behind a punishing offensive line. Against Kansas State, Stanford was often lucky to get 3 yards on a first down. This forced them to make some throws on second and third down, leaving a lot of time on the clock.

This inability to run the ball successfully no matter what, which Stanford has been able to do for quite some time now, resulted in a lot less time of possession for the Cardinal, and it allowed the Kansas State offense, another slow moving offense, to have plenty of time to work with. It really let the Wildcats back into the game in the second half, when they should have been long out of it.

Of course, this unit is a young one for the Cardinal, and it will only improve over time, but it is extremely important that Stanford can utilize McCafferey as well as possible, and if the O-line doesn’t improve quickly, Stanford will have some major troubles against tougher opponents down the road.

Comments

question (unrelated, i think)

did shaw ever go on the record after 2014 (or even during the season) and explain why that season was such a disaster (relative to every other performance as HC he’s had)?

He mentioned that there were several factors

He felt the OL never jelled and they threw way too much in their plates because of their 5-star reputation. Also they didn’t have a RB that could break tackles or be elusive. In fact ty montgomery looked the best RB of the bunch. It also didnt help that hogan had an injury and facing mental angst with his father. I would definitely give him a pass on that year considering he learnt from all those mistakes last year.

"Stanford football, who can sometimes be a little predictable"?

Shaw had better be a little less predictable quickly, because USC, Notre Dame etc are not going to wait for our O-line to mature.

Exactly.

I thought Burns showed we have the QB play necessary to open it up more (which would take some pressure off the line). Without more creativity those 3 road games (UCLA, UW and ND) could be ugly. I think we’re capable of winning all three, but we’ll need all the weapons. Saw glimpses of Shaw opening up last year. Hope to see more.

First time starters and first game

Let’s give them the benefit of the doubt of playing their first start and going against a really good KState front. USC and @UCLA will tell us more about the character of the team. You have to hand it to coach shaw for opening it up in the first half and not exactly playing field position. Maybe he saw the defense doing well and decided to stick with the running game to give them experience.

well

per your comment above, do you think we have anything to worry about with 3 new starters on the o-line?

It depends really on their development

One thing is clear, we don’t have the dominant offensive line like last year to lean on in the 4th quarter and dominate teams on the ground. There were some positive moments in the first half where they gave burns enough time and provided caff with some creases. The second half was a complete turn of events with mistakes galore from even the experienced guys.

What worries me is that we don’t have that 1 guy on the OL who is a surefire NFL 1st rounder we have had the past few years. So you can’t scheme to run to the left like last year. Even the returning OL like caspers and tucker got beat in pass protection in that second half. I think we will see growing pains especially if the QB doesn’t hit his stride on the tough road games

got it, thanks for explaining.

hopefully the 2 week bye has given the o-line time to correct themselves.

View All Comments
Back to top ↑